Posted 17 July 2006 - 11:34 AM
These are my questions:
1) Did she ever dance any of these roles? Maybe not at NYCB, but when she was in Bejart's company or maybe if she was a guest artists somewhere?
2) How would she have been in these roles? Maybe not all of those roles would have suited her style of dancing.
3) Do you think she ever regrets not getting a chance to do these roles? Since she was such a devoted disciple of Balanchine, she may have followed his dislike for classical ballet.
**I am so grateful that my sister took me to the NYCB in the spring of 1979. I saw her and Peter Martins dance the Tchaikovsky Pas de deux. As an 11 year old, I remember being frightened by all the people screaming "BRAVO!!!!!" after they were done.
Years later, I saw Suzanne receive an honorary degree from Fordham University - I think it was in 1987 - I was still an undergraduate student at the time.
Posted 17 July 2006 - 03:22 PM
Posted 17 July 2006 - 03:35 PM
....... she was such a devoted disciple of Balanchine, she may have followed his dislike for classical ballet.
Ceeszi, I think I understand what you mean, but Balanchine did not dislike the classics -- far from it. He always talked of his own Sleeping Beauty, Coppelia became part of the NYCB repertory under his watch, and he did his own one-act Swan Lake (danced by Farrell, among many others). Balanchine's work was an extension of the classical tradition, not a repudiation of it.
Posted 17 July 2006 - 03:58 PM
Also, I think she only performed Odette in that Canadian production, which split the roles, having another dancer perform Odile.
Posted 17 July 2006 - 04:08 PM
Posted 17 July 2006 - 04:21 PM
Posted 17 July 2006 - 04:49 PM
Posted 17 July 2006 - 05:03 PM
Posted 17 July 2006 - 05:09 PM
Miss Farrell was part brilliant, part subdued. She showed flair and authority, and, of course, her musicality was undiminished. But her arms, always her weakest aspect, once in a while flailed less than beguiling. To be frank: she looked like a gorgeous dancer who had slightly lost her way and should return to New York City Ballet without passing Go, without collecting $200 and most certainly without going to jail.
There's only one more paragraph regarding Farrell as Barnes suggests that both sides (Balanchine/NYCB and Farrell) have made their points. There was a follow-up article about dancers who leave large companies to dance at smaller ones. He interviews Kirstein, who says something like "where would you rather dance, Toronto or Covent Garden?"
Posted 17 July 2006 - 05:11 PM
Were the NBoC performances during the period when she and Mejia were out of NYCB (spring 1968-1974)?
They were. I believe they were Farrell's first high profile engagements after the rupture with Balanchine. (She said in the book there was some talk of her joining the company, and she dropped hints that she was interested, but the company didn't follow up.)
Posted 17 July 2006 - 06:28 PM
Posted 17 July 2006 - 06:35 PM
Posted 17 July 2006 - 06:49 PM
From her book:"I felt a special affinity for him because I thought we both devoured space with the same passion, and I would have liked to dance with him, but it was impossible because of the great diference in our heights."
Did Farrell ever dance with Baryshnikov during his year at NYCB? I haven't been able to find any mention of it googling, and had been surprised about the one 'Apollo' with Nureyev, so I assume she did not. However, I definitely don't know even though I never heard of it.
Posted 17 July 2006 - 06:55 PM
Returning to one part of Ceeszi's original question -- which of the classical roles would those of you who saw a lot of Farrell choose for her?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users