I somehow missed this thread. (Is "View New Posts" working properly?)
But I wanted to thank you for the link to the Alonso article. I can't think of another major performer still in a position of cultural power whose experience goes back so many decades. Alonso really was "present at the creation" of serious classical ballet in the Americas.
Her description of the formation of her approach to Swan Lake is a fascinating introduction to her artistic life, for those -- like myself -- who know very little about it.
I was especially impressed by the centrality she gives to classical technique -- as something without which the deepest drama cannot be created. (It's in the section devoted to comparing the White and Black Swan pas de deux):
Quote
The technical virtuosism is of major importance in the pas de deux of the Black Swan: it is part of the seduction. But it has to be exquisite, of an extreme classical perfection. You have to watch the lines, the academic faultlessness and exquisiteness. In a way, there is a technical-aesthetic competition with the White Swan. And one has to be very much aware of a fundamental truth: with technique, the ballet dancer can create an atmosphere. But if you don't have or don't master technique, you don't have the instrument, you don't have the words with which to create that ambiance, you don't have color, don't have light, or life, or line, you have nothing.
Italics are mine.

We've had a lot of talk about White Swan/ Black Swan issues on many threads. But that phrase "...
there is a technical-aesthetic competition with the White Swan ... " is one of the real gems of ballet insight and ballet writing. Very cool.