QUOTE (Naoko S @ May 23 2004, 01:51 AM)
Estelle, thanks for the summary of the article and for your comments. It's very interesting to learn that Mathieu's nomination was regarded by French ballet public as an extremely exceptional case - even by comparison with similar cases for Legris & Le Riche.
Well, perhaps part of the problem is that for much of the audience, he still is basically unknown, since he has danced so few roles so far (only two big roles, and almost no soloist roles before). He's the youngest promoted principal since Guillem two decades ago, and even her had been promoted to première danseuse before, and, I think, had been given more roles before being promoted. On the whole, I don't think there has been such a quick promotion since perhaps Michel Renault in 1946 (and I guess there might have been a lack of male principals then, because of the war period), so that's why it just was so unexpected to everybody. even René Sirvin, who isn't exactly known for criticizing the POB direction, finds such a promotion a bit premature. Also it often was said that the reason why Pech had not been promoted yet was just a question of "no available position" (I never understood how all that worked), and now it shows that when the direction wants to promote someone, indeed they can.
But perhaps it's also a question of "habit": people have get used to relatively "slow" promotions, for example the last two promoted male principals, José Martinez and Jean-Guillaume Bart, who weren't exactly untalented dancers, were promoted to premiers danseurs respectively in 1992 and 1996, and to principals in 1997 and 2000 only (actually I think they'd have deserved to be promoted quite earlier in my opinion). Now it will be interesting to see if this is really a change of policy for the direction, and if they will continue to promote young dancers, or if it's just an exceptional decision.
QUOTE
(Well it's not only in France - I've been surprised and almost overwhelmed by great sympathy Japanese POB fans have shown towards M. Peche, in this instance.) Although the strict hierarchy do exist at POB, a special dancer deserves a special treatment I think - otherwise would it not lead to a reverse-discrimination? Dancer's age alone doesn't really matter either if you believe ballet world should forever ban a poisonous seniority order!
The problem is that, given the way things seem to work, it means that it's more and more likely that Pech will never get promoted (while Ganio, who was younger, still had "plenty of time" to get promoted a bit later)- I've no idea how much time it will take before another male principal gets promoted, but Pech is about 30 now.
QUOTE
And what is prerequisite to become Etoile? To me key factors seem to be natural talent and a star quality.
I'd also add "to be a role model for the rest of the company", and "to be able to carry a performance on your shoulders", if that makes sense, and some experience might help.
QUOTE
Sounds interesting - I wish I could hear the rumours!
Well, I can say one of them now, some people were wondering if Gilbert and/ or Thibault might be promoted after their Sunday performance in "Don Quixote", but nothing special happened.
Leigh Witchel wrote:
QUOTE
Alessio Carbone has moved up young and fast; I liked him a great deal. Is he being favored by the direction at all?
I guess Brigitte Lefèvre and Hugues Gall probably are the only ones able to understand what the company policy is... :grinning: Carbone was not cast as Basilio, even though he had been cast at the beginning and had started working that role, but now he's an understudy for James and might get to dance it. So far, it seems to me that he hasn't been any real principal role since his promotion at the end of 2002, he dances mostly some traditional "premier danseurs" roles (like peasant pas de deux, "Swan Lake" pas de trois, and so on). I wonder if his relatively small height might be a disadvantage. However, perhaps he'll get cast a bit more, with Bélingard and Moreau being unfortunately injured.
Françoise, thanks for the precision about Manuel's Legris promotion at 21 and not 22 (I had assumed that it was 22 as he was born in 1964 and promoted in 1986, but I don't know his birth date). But one big difference with Ganio was that he had been a sujet since 1982.