[I'm starting this thread under Boston Ballet, because it consists of my reactions to Boston Ballet's March 14th, 2006 matinee performance... but I'd really rather it ended up under "Ballets" than "ballet companies" in the hopes that someone who saw the original Fille will respond.. is it possible to move it there leaving a link from under Boston Ballet?]
After hearing of it for so long, I have finally seen La Fille Mal Gardee and I wonder why it too me so long to see this ballet! It belongs in every company's rep, at least every company that mounts Nutcracker and Coppelia. I only wish I had taken my seven-year-old. This piece is certainly a Coppelia alternate. And so, is it yet in most company's repetoires? Is this a relatively recent development?
Okay, my random observations:
I was very happy to have been given a friend's comp ticket for an orchestra seat I could never have afforded on my own. I take back everything I might have said about the Wang before... from the orchestra it is a perfectly lovely place to watch ballet. Companies always seem better to me when I sit closer up (unless of course they're completely hopeless, then it's better to sit far far away and imagine one sees pointed feet and stretched knees).
However, IF the Ballet is going to print credits in it's program in 5 & 6 point size typefaces, than it #%*-well ought to bring the house lights up a little brighter during intermission. I'm no spring chicken, but I'm not geriatric either, and when in frustration I asked my 19 year-old neighbor to read the lines in question, she had to bring it practically up to her nose to read it. (and yes, I was trying to figure out who their archival videographer was, however I also couldn't read the text under the dancers' names and come to think of it could barely make out their names). [and one more Wang thing: just what were those boxes with red pilot lights in them above the speakers on the sides of the proscenium?]
Okay, back to the ballet in question.
I remember seeing photos of Alain with a butterfly net and something in the synopsis that he would prefer to be chasing butterflies.... am I thinking of some other ballet? There was no butterfly net in this, but a red umbrella was his frequent companion... Was this changed over the years?
The work was set on Boston Ballet by it's copyright owner: Alexander Grant. I'm afraid I didn't know the name, but Ballet.co had some info to fill me in: he was the original Alain. Ballet.co also has some historical notes on Fille, but no info on a butterfly net.
I enjoyed the "etching" cross-hatchings of shadows on Osbert Lancaster's sets & drops. (Who wouldn't love a giant portrait of a cow above one's fireplace?) What were those strange trees around the lake in the front curtain? (my vocabulary has vanished... can't remember what one calls the front drop, fore curtain).
I'm wondering if different choreographers can be said to have different musicality... Would Balanchine want his dancers so clean fast that they almost preceded the beat while Ashton perhaps wanted them to almost follow it? At times I wished the dancers musicality was a little more lushly langorous. I was thinking that, similarly to the Joffrey dancers performing the Nikolais piece in "The Company" that there were some examples of "over execution" of steps... steps where the shape & line was so over emphasized in that "diamond necklace" way that focus on the quality of the movement was lost... as if our current training of dancers is so "technique" oriented (aka flexibility & line & sharp execution) that a certain patina in the quality of movement has been lost... or perhaps that the movement loses a little of it's human origin/instigation/personality/character.
However, let me not be misunderstood... there was some glorious dancing on stage at the Wang on Sunday. I felt very priveleged to watch Misa Kuranaga & Reyneris Reyes. In particular, I'm grateful for Misa Kuranaga for dispelling my former notion that Japanese ballerinas are too reticent to be much fun watching outside of Les Sylphides. Although listed as a only "second soloist" (what's that?), she was delightful as Lise. I think this pair was the poster cast? (Photo next to La Fille). The pantomime was wonderful... she had us all laughing with her antics to throw off the Widow Simone. I haven't seen much Ashton (the last thing was Sylvia, which I didn't much enjoy), but I gather pantomime scenes were one of his special gifts. Reyneris Reyes pulled off some wonderful virtuoso bits... no complaints from me.
I enjoyed the ribbon motif throughout the piece, though I thought there was something off with the ribbon material... it didn't float where it seemed like it should float and it didn't fling where it seemed it should fling. I remember an Isadora Duncan dancer talking to me once about how expensive her costumes were because they had to be of a certain weight of silk or they didn't move properly... I'm wondering what was up with the ribbons, here? Anyone know? (it was a rainy spitting god-awful day, perhaps it was just a humidity issue?... any dancer with arthritis or tendonitis issues must have been considering retirement)
Speaking of ribbons, I loved that fantastic balance in Lise's ribbon guided promenade in attitude. Is/was beautiful balance an English strong point? I keep remembering/imaging Fonteyn as Aurora...
And what is the story with those Chickens? I couldn't help chortling every time I saw them. Sadistic, don't you think? Were animals in ballet a favorite amusement of the Queen Mother? I seem to remember reading somewhere that she & Ashton were chummy. Did he put these in to entertain her?
Widow Simone was wonderfully acted by Christopher Budzynski, though I wasn't convinced by the clog dance. This is one of those things I've heard about now for about 4 decades, so my perhaps anticipation was too high. I enjoyed the choreography but felt the timing was subtlely off... as if a tap dancer or vaudevillian or British musical hall denizen would have pulled it off slightly differently. And those wierd clogs the girls wore behind him.... is that what they've always worn? They seemed very rubbery instead of wooden.
The corps desported themselves well in the various "country" dances... really seemed to be enjoying themselves.
There were some costume mishaps... Widow Simone's dress caught & half the trim ripped off when a drawer closed on it, and a corps dancer's hat slid off and into her face while she was dancing. I think dancers should be trained to deal with this sort of thing just as they are expected to do their own make-up, etc.. It's so difficult to figure out what to do about something like this while you're trying to keep up with the music, etc... but it's just so distracting to watch... it would be far less distracting to disappear offstage for a moment and fix it than keep dancing in spite of it... the absence would be less distracting than the costume misbehaving. It is very hard to think spontaneously when one's brain is caught up in trying to maintain the action, but it should be drilled as a knee-jerk reaction to stop & fix the problem (knee-jerk reaction because that would be the only hope). A while into the scene Christopher Budzynski managed to do something to tie it up, but until that point many of us in the audience were wondering whether he was going to trip on it (I heard several comments to this effect after the show).
What is that dance with sticks done in the second act? Is it supposed to be some sort of threshing dance? I also dearly wished that the sheafs of corn (grain to us Americans who think "corn" is maize and nothing else) were a little more realistic.
My favorite Ashton moment? 2nd act: those tingling bourees done after the kiss on the neck.... or maybe it was the whole transom pas de deux.
