QUOTE (Dale @ Mar 29 2006, 11:01 AM)

My quick thoughts are, there's a lot of Balanchine . . . and not that much Ashton.
QUOTE (Leigh Witchel @ Mar 29 2006, 11:28 AM)

Yes, not much Ashton.
QUOTE (Alexandra @ Mar 29 2006, 02:50 PM)

No, not much Ashton. Actually, barely any Ashton. Back in the Heritage bin already?
QUOTE (Helene @ Mar 29 2006, 05:52 PM)

If Royal Ballet doesn't perform Ashton on a regular basis, who will keep the style and rep alive?
QUOTE (bart @ Mar 29 2006, 04:41 PM)

What do you all think about Kobborg's setting of Bournonville's Tarantella Divertissements as part of an evening including La Sylphide, which has already been a success. Is this the sign of a trend towads even more Bournonville at the Royal? What kind of effect might such a trend have on the dancers' style at the Royal (British, not Danish)?
At the risk of oversimplifying, it seems to me that a company that excels at Ashton should be able to do nicely by Bournonville. But I guess that doesn't answer your question, bart.

Actually, this may be a temporary retraction after All That Ashton of the centennial year. Like Paul Taylor's company hauling out his Greatest Hits for the 2004-2005 (50th Anniversary) season, leaving slim pickin's for this year.