I feel like this thread is one of the liveliest I've ever seen and so far with some detours one of the most civil on this topic. I also apologize for not weighing in sooner with responses and clarifications to points I personally raised, but a thread that generates over 100 posts (allowing for at least a few more today) between July 23 and July 28 is a bit daunting. Monitoring this is a fulltime job, literally.
I have tried to take the considerable time to review this thread and pull out a few themes, and with the encouragement of one of the moderators weigh in on a few issues. As I said previously, I am not a moderator, but I do have decades of personal thought and formal training on these diversity/identity matters that I would like to share. I offer this, not to step on anyone's toes, but respectfully as an effort to be part of the solution, not the problem, as we used to say in the 60s.
We must exercise great care in this discussion. As a veteran of many of these encounters over the years, I offered my three initial points of agreement in the first post. I am not requiring anyone to believe these, but would ask that anyone who seriously and constructively wants to address these issues IN THIS DISCUSSION, agree to these three. If anyone disagrees that's fine, but frankly, it needs to be handled outside this thread because it impedes discussion. This is not a judgment about anyone personally but if we cannot get this agreement, we can't move forward.
I am a relatively new member and can't seem to master the quote function so I have pasted in the section of my earliest post to which I refer:
I think a good starting point helps. Just as men are not ideally positioned to fully appreciate the ins and outs of gender discrimination, our lived experience definitively differs and determines our racially defined realities in this country--with our American history it cannot be otherwise. As mentioned in other posts, some have the priviledge (luxury?) of not having to think about race, while others must confront at least the possibility of it affecting their lives every day as soon as they leave their front door (maybe even before). Not only are these viewpoints radically different, they do not confer equal expertise in discussing this issue. We must first get past this to have a productive discussion. Then we have to move forward as people of goodwill to explore productive creative remedies to achieve a better climate specifically for ballet.
I think it would be good to first agree that we want ballet to be more inclusive, more representative, but I'm not sure everyone agrees this is desirable. I do think this needs to be an acknowledged desirable goal. Whether we think there is discrimination or not, can we agree there is underrepresentation? If we can make this a given, can we procede to identify greater diversity and inclusiveness as a valuable change we would like to see in ballet--be it audiences, administrators, performers, students, teachers, choreographers, critics, or patrons?
I think agreement on these points:
#1-the extreme subjectivity of our viewpoints and the lack of equivalence and level of expertise of these viewpoints
#2-the underrepresentation of people of of color--noticeably and demonstrably non-white--throughout all levels of the ballet scene
#3-the desirability of having ballet in the future thriving while evolving in a more inclusive and racially diverse world
would go far toward furthering discussion.
I said in my second post, later that same day, I felt the substance of my first July26 post had been somewhat ignored. Frankly, I still feel these points are worth repeating and I should say why.
Some have said explicitly or implied that inclusiveness is not a high priority for them in ballet. Issues of race and discrimination are not paramount in their daily lives, and the differences between terms like colored people, or people of color, don't really matter to them personally. Many have questioned whether there is anything actually going on in the ballet world that is really exclusionary. These represent personal points of view that I must respect as I must respect all persons. However, if we cannot agree that people of color are underrepresented and that is desirable to remedy this, such viewpoints will serve ONLY to derail any efforts to create solutions to this thorny problem.
I respectfully submit that those who do not believe there is a problem, or who do not believe this is a priority worth dedicating time and energy to can enter this discussion only to prevent change. I don't think that behavior is respectful, respectable, appropriate , or welcome. I would politely request that going forward, people who don't think there is a problem, refrain from offering suggestions and solutions (non-solutions) to other members who are sincerely trying to work toward remedies. Of course, it's fine to believe we are wasting our time on this thread, but if this is to become a problem solving exercise, try to refrain from shutting others down with the continual questioning of the reality with which we must deal. And I thank people in advance for at least taking seriously the points I have just made.
I think agreeing to my initial points #2 and #3 is crucial, but even more vital and more difficult is agreeing to point #1. We live different lives in this country based on our own visible racial and ethnic identities. Our experiences and opinions are distinct. Some cannot choose to ignore these issues. They do not have that luxury (rephrased from the earlier post of mine). Those who can choose whether or not to confront these issues must acknowledge that having a choice on this is already a form of priviledge.
We never like to admit to these kinds of difference in the US, but in this case, I believe it is less divisive to admit that the potential targets of discrimination are in a different position than everyone else. That is what I was suggesting with my gender example. Do men and women have equal expertise on what it is like to have a life circumscribed by gender discrimination? Absolutely not. Please note, here I said expertise. Men must defer to women on this issue; they--the women--must be acknowledged as the experts, the authorities. All opinions are not equally valid. The same is true here on issues of race and discrimination.
In our eagerness to reassure ourselves, we bring out examples of the rare exceptional cases of people who have managed to surmount barriers even as we ignore these folks' own descriptions of real injuries, pain and discrimination that they suffered. Is it any wonder that dancers of color are reluctant to attest to problems in their personal experience in such a climate? Given the daunting odds against anyone having a successful career in ballet, it becomes difficult, as several posters have pointed out, very difficult to sort out what factor race may play in hiring, firing, and promotions. Difficult, but not impossible, and here I would like to make a few more observations/suggestions.
We appear to be going round and round about racism, who is, who isn't, if ballet is or ballet isn't. These questions are unproductive if they are about subjective feelings whether it is guilt or outrage. The answers require too much soul searching, confession, and angst. Moreover, the answers are often colored by wishful thinking--not me, not here, not anymore, etc. Questions of intent and well meaning-ness are similarly fraught. This also gets back to questions of authority and our own subjective realities, but more about this later.
For the time being, and especially in the instance of accusing people or institutions of practicing racism, let's avoid feelings and stick with practices. As one poster (defjef, I think) defines racism it is based on institutionalized exclusionary practices--this is not about feelings. Also practices are things we can make a commitment to change, and our inner hearts and souls remain, rightfully our own private property.
I was careful to speak of underrepresentation without trying to discover intent. Here we get into the thorny territory of evidence. This thread begins with the simple observation, made by Defjef, that the ballet world lacks diversity. Carbro as a knowlegeable moderator lists a collection of related threads that are part of the history of this board.
Defjef introoduces the term racism, and Mel Johnson wearing two hats it seems, both a professional historian's hat and his official Ballet Talk status--introduces the counter term anti-racism and working toward solutions. Herman Stevens finds the whole topic "depressing" and feels black dancers are surely welcome everywhere. As an example he mentions the one would think predictably lily white Royal Ballet and its perennial favorite Carlos Acosta (identifiably of African descent). Mr Stevens points out black dancers are crowd pleasers, what company wouldn't want them!?!
Many posts early on in this thread also chastize Defjef for one thing or another (lucky he is self-described as thick skinned on this issue), and several moderators (Alexandra, Helene, Leigh W.) weigh in on proper conduct, proper subject matter, and gound rules to procede. There are also pointed recommendations from Major Mel and Bart to stay productive/constructive (see posts 18-31)
I'm glad this thread survived that difficult time, but I suggest, some of the problems that lead to that shakey point have not yet been addressed. I apologize in advance to Herman Stevens, but I am curious about why you weigh in on a topic that you seem to believe is not actually a problem? If you find it irrelevant that's okay, but once we have established underrepresentation and are trying to find the cause and the remedy, what does it serve to suggest everyone everywhere wants to hire crowd pleasing black dancers? I am not trying to point the finger, I am simply mystified by your intent. You are apparently similarly confused by my discourse and noted the following:
Herman Stevens is alarmed at and questions my definition of the term "we." I am defining it as it is explicitly laid out on this board--ballet lovers and supporters! Why does this stated definition of our community here on line get "scarey" and questionnable when we hit this particular discussion?
My euphemism of "purist" may have been the problem. I said we might lose a few "purists," and seemed not to care. I meant someone so committed to preserving the exclusionary practices incorporated in the history of ballet that this commitment would preclude participating in the reimagined future of ballet if ballet becomes more inclusive. I hope this is more clear. I did not want to be inflammatory and label anyone as racist or bigotted, but in this discussion , that might have been less confusing.
I hope we are more clear now about "we" here at Ballet Talk and can procede with more clarity.
As we seek creative ways to make ballet more inclusive, many have been concerned that this will lower the technical level of dance, dumb down the rep, or transform the art into something we can no longer recognize. Partly, I think this reflects how narrow the historical context of ballet has been and our inability to imagine ballet completely divorced from this very particular cultural and historical context. I hope it does not represent a sincere belief that including dancers who are not 'the usual suspects' a la Casablanca means the art form will necessarily be diminished if we include more diversity in the dancers. Let's explore this a bit.
Is this fear based on the worry that judgments will be made based on something other than excellence? If so, why don't we worry like this when discussing ways of including more male dancers even though we willingly admit they are rarer than female ballet dancers and that we need extra incentives along the way to ensure their presence? Why don't we worry in this FUNCTIONALLY equivalent situation? Why aren't people objecting to extra efforts (scholarships for example to males at every technical level)? Why, because we have decided that men are essential to ballet. We have to have partners, don't we? If we need to make extra efforts to bring this about, we bite the bullet and do so, because it is a desirable goal. Even as we speculate about why (is it the lack of males entering? is the studio climate making it difficult for males to remain in training? is it outside peer pressure?, etc.), we want the men here , so we go about doing whatever it takes to bring it about. Even before we have the answers to the why questions, we make efforts to find solutions, trusting that the proof is in the pudding. We do so tirelessly and consistently over time until we see results. We share strategies for attracting and retaining males, and we judge success on results.
I would suggest, if we decide we want to make ballet more inclusive, we have many practices already in place that could at least give hints as to how to make changes. We need be in no more fear that including many black, Asian and Pacific Islander, native American, or latin dancers is more likely to presage the death of ballet as we know it, than we fear similar efforts to recruit and RETAIN males. Technical excellence is--must be--a given. If we want to be inclusive and we do not still believe certain groups are genetically and biologically unsuited to dance ballet, we can use the example of including men with no worries about threats to the art form. Dancers can be equally valued without being identical, and we need to fearlessly do whatever possible to attract and welcome diversity throughout the ballet world.
Another example that occurred to me while reading this thread. Wouldn't it be interesting to see a contemporary story ballet crafted around MLKing's "Letters from a Birmingham Jail?" Imagine a corps of diverse dancers being hosed down by a police department of equally diverse dancers while the Rev. MLK crafts his responses. It could include variations enacting various sentiments expressed in the "Letters." How wonderful that could be if properly handled. Ballet technique is substantially the same in Paris, France and Paris, Texas, imagine harnessing that beauty to contemporary themes. (Before anyone jumps on me for keeping politics out of ballet, look back at the threads on ballet's history, think about the role of the military, nobility and court, their close relationship to ballet, and how politics created these venerable institutions...) Would this necessarily be a dumbed down rep? Would this fill seats like other story ballets?
If you prefer abstract ballet, think about a ballet devoted to the "jazz aesthetic" (much scholarship on a musical genre many musicologists have called 'American classical music'). This would address the stylistic innovations introduced in jazz with or without the necessity of an explicitly race based historical context. Scholars have looked at the similarities and contrasts among what have been described as two types of classical or symphonic music. These abstract artistic concepts could be embodied and explored through classical dance.
If we can find the will, we can find the imagination and ballet is already sublime--we have the tool.
This reply is already far too long. I have some more important points on:
terminology, listening respectfully to the assertions of authorities (the targets of discrimination) when they speak on underrepresentation and its causes, staying concrete--for ex why not follow up on the questions about Dance Theatre of Harlem by doing simple searches like where these dancers have landed and if they were hired at comparable levels, looking at how Raven Wilkinson's story has been a lightning rod for so many issues in this thread, empirical evidence, how neutral or standard is even a simple dress code if, for ex., hair doesn't form naturally into a smooth bun?, etc., creating a welcoming (this does NOT mean colorblind) climate that promotes equal access and inclusion, bart's request for more on meeting people on their own terms, the difficulty of ANYONE having a ballet career and how race could be teased out of what is already a long shot proposition.
but this is already too long (length, time to read, time to write).
I may not have internet access for a few days, so in my absence, I hope some things in this long post generate light more than heat and move us forward. Please understand if there are no responses from me for a bit. I promise to check back on or before August 1st.
Thanks so much to everyone who has taken the time and made effort to work through this difficult but vital subject