You guys are writing an exciting new chapter in ballet history for the 21st century, the Age of Segal.
In order to meet the new Segal Standards, a "new" ballet will have to be relevant to today's world. It will have to avoid escapism and fantasy. It's dancers must be treated with respect and not subjected to the tyranny of body type or antique technical demands. It must NOT be pretty. (I exaggerate a bit.)
One 20th century classic that is badly in need of updating is Balanchine's Western Symphony, which perpetuates myths of the happy and innocent cowboy, seems to revel in the sexual exploitation of young women on the frontier, and attempts to deceive the audience by depicting an "Old West" in which there are no Native Americans at all and the issue of genocide is never even raised.
I propose a drastic change in locale and time period to save this ballet from its irrelevance and "poisonous exoticism." A Western Symphony transferred to an American military base in the Middle East in 2006 might be a good idea as well as a powerfully relevant anti-war and anti-imperialist statement.
Cowboy swagger could easily be improved by replacing it with dark, scarey, primitive movements of military men unleashed and going crazy. Gone will be the dance-hall girls. We will replace them with mysterious but suffering indigenous women whose bodies are entirely hidden by their shapeless black chadors. An additional bonus of this kind of costuming is that it would allow us to cast the ballet without regard to the tyrannies of body type, ideal proportions, weight restrictions, etc., Thus we can satisfying another of Segal's objections).
The women will wear only one point shoe. The other foot will be bare. This will express the essential conflict between the artificial and stultifying spirit of classical Western culture as contrasted with the more authentic values of the oppressed people of the world who can't afford shoes. The fact that this will create a great deal of limping on stage will reinforce our desire to achieve true "beauty" by avoiding the merely "pretty" as much as possible.
Throughout the revised ballet, we'll have dark, conflicted interactions instead of joyful dances. The one truly innocent male character, who apparently believes in the possibility of dancing without dire political implications, will be shot down during an especially difficult double tour en l'air in Part III.
If you recall Balanchine's sadly out-of-date version of this ballet, the entire cast jumps repeatedly, joyfully, and apparently endlessly, as the curtain falls. We will replace this finale with falling missiles and despairing dancers, crouching, raising their tormented arms to the heavens, opening their mouths in silent screams. The missiles will make a profound point:
"Down" replaces "up" in our world today -- and our ballet will be unflinching in hammering home this point. As the curtain falls we will be left with a vision of corpses littering the stage, and scavengers emerging from their holes to rob the dead and finish off the wounded. The back cloth, dark grey and threatening throughout the ballet, will turn deep crimson, bathing everyone in the rich color of death.
Some of you may object: "But this wouldn't work with the corny, bouncy, basically happy folk music of the score,"
I reply: "Haven't you ever heard of IRONY." "Oh dem golden slippers" is a wonderful vehicle for depicting our society's sick materialism. And "Red River Valley" suits perfectly the rivers of blood with which our wonderfully relevant ballet ends.