Thanks, kfw, for that Link. A much more complex concept than I thought.
I guess I always equated plastique with the ability to link different poses, thereby creating an impression of flow, continuity and ... I guess you'd say ... "rightness." All the posts on that earlier thread are very helpful, but Paul Parrish came closest to expressing what I had always thought (in an unformed way) but never tried to put into words.
QUOTE
But what it means, I think, in ballet terms, since ballet is an idealistic art, has to do with sculpting, molding an ideally beautiful shape. Technically, you might say it's more about posing than moving -- except that really beautiful movement goes through really beautiful positions, and the pirouettes we remember for hte rest of our lives always express ideally beautiful positions.
Paul describes, beautifully, two examples of Baryshnikov in motion. I urge you to read the post.
Does anyone have any other examples of dancers who show exceptional plastique?