QUOTE (carbro @ Mar 26 2008, 01:17 AM)

Besides Tony, Riff ("Cool") and Anita and Rosalia ("America") do their own singing. I've never noticed pit singers -- don't sit where I have an easy sightline to most of the orchestra pit. During its debut season WSSS included solo singers at the side of the stage, but the piece was restaged to eliminate them. Maybe they were brought back for this tour?
New mother Jenifer Ringer (not on this tour) told an audience at a book event of having to audition her singing skills for Robbins before cast her as Anita.
There are singers in the pit in NY, at least there were this past season. Aside from singing Somewhere, they also sing the background on America and several other songs, I guess it fills out the sound.
I’ve enjoyed reading these posts and have also been amused at the reactions to NYCB by ballet lovers who don't see them often. The messy lines, broken wrists etc. are things that I consider to be hallmarks of the Balanchine style. Not to say they're the same company as they were 30 years ago, or that they are not inconsistent but I remember all of these things from watching NYCB in the late 60s through the mid seventies. My ballet tastes were formed by early exposure to the Royal Ballet (Fonteyn/Nureyev visits), followed by ABT, so things like a corps that were never in unison and those ragged port de bras horrified me. Yet those were things that Balanchine obviously either didn’t care about or actively encouraged so it amuses me that people still complain about them. I guess my eyes adjusted to it a long time ago.
I go back and forth between watching NYCB and classical companies all the time now, and I’ve found that I like my Balanchine best when it’s fast, sharp & syncopated (as NYCB does it) and my classical best by companies like the Kirov and Royal. To my mind they’re just 2 very different styles of ballet.