William Forsythe is interviewed by Roslyn Sulcas for
classicaltv.com. (Link snitched from new member
Lucy Johns, who posted it on another part of the site. Thanks, Lucy.

)
QUOTE
RS: So even though your work doesn’t look much like traditional ballet, you are still, in a sense, engaged in a dialogue with its constituents?
WF: Well, part of the instigation for all of this was Balanchine. We inherited a significant dilemma in so far as Balanchine provided paradigmatic examples of musical interpretation through his sublime musicality and expertise.
At the start of my career, in Stuttgart, it was imperative that I used the orchestra, and I made ballets to Handel, to Bach, to Penderecki, Hans Werner Henze. I was fortunate to have that situation and I worked my craft according to those conditions. When I began to work in Frankfurt, it became clear to me the orchestra would never rehearse our work enough to provide the kind of excellent musicianship I wanted, so I distanced myself from that. And if one acknowledged that one didn’t have exactly the same skills as Balanchine, where would the function of musicality reside, and how would it express itself for other choreographers?